The Kremlin's Financial Retaliation: Why Russia's Threats to the West Are Nothing More Than Empty Blackmail

When the West began talking about transferring frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, Moscow raised a wave of indignation and promised severe “retaliation” — allegedly confiscating up to $215 billion in Western investments and derivatives. What is really behind these threats: a serious financial “nuclear” response or a typical Putin intimidation tactic aimed at European bureaucrats and corporate lobbyists?

Frozen billions: why is the Kremlin nervous?

The EU and the G7 are working on a mechanism to transfer at least $164 billion of frozen Russian assets in the West to Ukraine. ¹
This money should cover Ukraine's military needs for another 2-3 years — or lay the foundation for future reparations. For Russia, this is a blow to the very "engine" of aggression, and for Ukraine's allies — a logical step in response to a brutal violation of international law.

In response, the Kremlin has started a fuss: it promises to expropriate an alleged $215 billion of Western assets in Russia. But, as Western analysts emphasize, there are simply no such reserves in Russia. What there is has either already been formally confiscated (Carlsberg, Danone, Western banks) or remains only on paper. ¹

“Western companies knew who they were dealing with”

Russia began the "nationalization" of foreign assets back in 2022-2024: large transnational corporations ignored the warnings of the EU and US governments for too long.
As a result, banks, manufacturers, and energy giants have suffered huge losses, and the riskiest assets have already been effectively written off the balance sheets of Western companies.
The “financial punishment” will only affect those who remained in Russia for the sake of super profits and knowingly risked their future.

No European state will now protect these businesses: the strategic interest of security outweighs private losses, especially in times of war. ¹

What will the West really lose?

Most Western assets in Russia have already been either confiscated or written off to a minimum. These are assets that remain on companies' balance sheets (usually at a reduced value), and their loss will have little impact on the economies of Europe or the United States.
The main risk is reputational and for the Russian economy: such excesses will ultimately repel even potential Chinese investors, freezing any opportunities for the return of Western capital for years. ¹

If the Kremlin really goes all-in and destroys the remnants of the Western private sector in Russia, it will be the most massive attack on private property since the Soviet era. But Russia itself will suffer first and foremost: investment will stop not only from Europe, but also, probably, from China, India, and Turkey.

Legal context: why the West has nothing to fear

Everything that Russia has is the private property of companies, not seized state money (unlike the reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which were frozen by Western countries).
Once the West starts channeling Russia’s frozen reserves to Ukraine, it will not be expropriation, but a “countermeasure” to aggression that international law already allows. Private assets are protected by international law, and payments will be minimal or symbolic.

The main thing is to overcome political pressure and lobbying from the remnants of Western companies in Russia. But if the West does not give in, it will be the “old risky business projects” that will pay, not taxpayers in Europe or the United States.

Why does the Kremlin need these threats: blackmailing lobbyists and playing on the nerves of society

Moscow's real goals:

• Sow panic among businesses and governments - suddenly the West will get scared and not give assets to Ukraine.
• Strengthen the “fifth column” of corporate lobbyists who are trying to influence Brussels and Washington in order to “preserve investments.”
• To cause a political crisis in EU countries - if Ukraine's money has to be paid not from Russian reserves, but directly from the taxpayers' budget.

This game is familiar from previous years: hype, blackmail, and constant pressure on the “nerve points” of Western elites. But the real impact of these actions is gradually fading away — the price of supporting businesses operating under Moscow’s dictates has become too high.

European scenario: is it realistic to seize Russian assets?

The plans of the European Commission and G7 governments are to channel frozen Russian central bank assets into long-term loans for Ukraine.
If Russia pays reparations, the money will be returned, but if not, it will go to cover losses and reconstruction.
Thus, over $500 billion of Russian assets have already been "converted" in the West, while less than $200 billion of Western money remains "hostage" to the Kremlin. ¹

The pro-presidential bloc in Europe (Ursula von der Leyen, Friedrich Merz, the British government) openly supports radical solutions. Now the answer for the leaders of sentiment is to hold the financial front as firmly as they hold the military one.

The conclusion of a sharp analyst: the “black box” of Kremlin threats is no longer frightening

In the context of a global war of budgets and exchange rates, Russia can no longer scare the West with “financial nuclear weapons.”
Its capabilities are limited, its arguments have long lost their weight.
The issue of compensation and reparations is becoming only a tool for political stability for the EU and the US — and the Kremlin's role in this game, as well as in military strategy, is increasingly marginal.

Sources