Is there a cunning secret in the primitive survey-2020? Exclusive

We will look back for a long time to the year that has finally passed... The year 2020, which is scarred by political confrontations.

The year 2020 gave many answers to a specific question: what does the current government really want? And the actions of powerful sub-punks make it possible to claim that under the slogans "For the people!" a primitive desire for profit and enrichment is hidden.

And somehow, it would seem, aside from greed, there remains a strange, already forgotten by everyone, act of "nationwide survey", which "our servants" conducted on the day of last year's local elections.

When in some current reports a mention of that pseudo-referendum appears - with a barely audible echo - the feeling that the true reason for conducting that "survey" has been hidden emerges and persists.

And I want to look around and try to figure it out. Or at least make an assumption: for what? Cui bono? Who benefits? Who needed that shadowy, lawless, outburst of activity in the form of a "survey"?

The answer, of course, must be sought in the questions themselves. As they say: if you want to hide something, put it in a prominent place.

What did they put on the head of the Ukrainians - in front of everyone in broad daylight?

Let's recall the 5 points of the survey. And let's think about each one: the answer to the question "why?" - among them.

In the first - "Do you support the idea of ​​life imprisonment for corruption in particularly large amounts?" — there is nothing special, well, just nothing at all. Such a primitive question has been heard in all mass media of the country for thirty years of Independence: from national to district ones. Nothing original. They would have already asked about the attitude to the introduction of the death penalty, as in China. There is already so much Chinese in our lives that it would not hurt to punish in Chinese one or two of those Ukrainians, who have broken up and burst out in such a way that they do not know the measure, would it not hurt? In short, it's not that cold.

The second: "Do you support the creation of a free economic zone in the territory of Donetsk and Luhansk regions?". Who should have answered? Those "economist analysts", who were 73% in the spring of 2019, but did not become in the fall of 2020? Not seriously. Cold, not that.

The third was: "Do you support reducing the number of people's deputies to 300?". But they have been shouting about it for ten years in the Council and at every corner. Shorten it. Legislatively. The majority of you. Coldly.

The final question was question No. 5: "Do you support the right of Ukraine to use the security guarantees defined by the Budapest Memorandum to restore its state sovereignty and territorial integrity?". This is even some sophisticated organized bullying on the scale of the country against the people of the same country. It is clear to everyone that the infamous "memorandum" is a piece of paper that did not work, does not work and will not work, and will not protect Ukraine. Only the current government does not understand. It's a shame. Coldly.

An attentive reader—and others should not be attracted—noticed that question #4 was not mentioned.

But: no, nobody forgot anything. It's just that question number 4 is the only specific and the only one directly related to money. With big money. And even very large ones.

#4: "Do you support the legalization of cannabis for medical purposes - to reduce pain in the seriously ill?". The implementation of the "legalization of cannabis for medical purposes" in Ukrainian life will bring billions to the "implementers". And maybe not only in hryvnias.

Question No. 4 is convertible, unlike the other four, which are about the memorandum, deputies, corruption... Also, is there "free economy"? But when will it be? Especially for such political opposition of the opposition? And number 4 - at least tomorrow. And the noble goal is to save people from suffering. Against pain. Who will refuse?... Who is against? Hot!

...Obviously, the authors of the text of the "internal survey" have carefully studied the global experience of conducting elections. And not suddenly, but with interest, they paid attention to the fact that the American presidential elections were taking place almost at the same time as the Ukrainian local ones.

And it was there and then — during the American presidential elections — that polls were also conducted in some states. And there are wonders! - also about drugs. About legalization. Ask: there are billions of dollars in that medical business. And scandals. And lawsuits. And courts. And lots and lots of money... A lot. Americans voted yes. And the point of view of the Ukrainians is understandable, but not yet legalized.

But no one closed the "topic". For example, one Internet resource submitted information under the following heading: "The Orthodox Church supported the legalization of marijuana in Ukraine." Authoritatively? Already in the text there is a mention that it is about the therapeutic, medical variant of the use of marijuana. In the text. Smaller font. And in huge font, it's just a drug. Even with the use of the name of the church... Are they preparing the groundwork?...

And so, just a few days ago: the decision to legalize medical cannabis in Ukraine is at the final stage: soon Ukrainian doctors will start testing it, the leader of the parliamentary faction said. You know which one.

Cui prodest? Whose profit?

Serhiyko Shchenevse
for Newsky